Re: [PATCH] lockd: fix FILE_LOCKING=n build error

[Felix Blyakher]

On Apr 28, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> lockd/svclock.c is missing a header file <linux/fs.h>.
>
> <linux/fs.h> is missing a definition of locks_release_private()
> for the config case of FILE_LOCKING=n, causing a build error:
>
> fs/lockd/svclock.c:330: error: implicit declaration of function  
> 'locks_release_private'
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>

Heh, I did miss it in my original patch, where I added
locks_release_private().
The fix looks good, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>

> ---
> fs/lockd/svclock.c |    1 +
> include/linux/fs.h |    4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-next-20090428.orig/fs/lockd/svclock.c
> +++ linux-next-20090428/fs/lockd/svclock.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> --- linux-next-20090428.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ linux-next-20090428/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1183,6 +1183,10 @@ static inline void locks_remove_flock(st
> 	return;
> }
>
> +static inline void locks_release_private(struct file_lock *fl)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline void posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct  
> file_lock *fl)
> {
> 	return;
>
> --
> ~Randy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- 
> fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/