Re: Should I choose SLOW_WORK?

[Jesper Juhl]

On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> I am newly presented with
> 
> 
> > Enable slow work thread pool (SLOW_WORK) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?
> > 
> > The slow work thread pool provides a number of dynamically allocated
> > threads that can be used by the kernel to perform operations that
> > take a relatively long time.
> > 
> > An example of this would be CacheFiles doing a path lookup followed
> > by a series of mkdirs and a create call, all of which have to touch
> > disk.
> 
> 
> However, this does not tell me whether I need or want this.
> 
> And, why must the user make this choice at all?  Surely it can be
> auto-selected, if cachefs is enabled?  At a minimum, hide this under
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED or whatnot, so that most users don't see this choice, IMO.
> 

I very much agree. I was confused by that option as well when I first saw 
it and the help text didn't really help much in determining if I wanted it 
or not.
If it's something that's generally useful, the kernel should just 
enable/use it. If other things depend on it they should auto-select it.


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>             http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/