Re: add_to_swap_cache with GFP_ATOMIC ?

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

>> IOW, GFP_ATOMIC on add_to_swap() was introduced accidentally. the reason
>> was old add_to_page_cache() didn't have gfp_mask parameter and we didn't
>>  have the reason of changing add_to_swap() behavior.
>> I think it don't have deeply reason and changing GFP_NOIO
>> don't cause regression.
>
> You may well be right: we'll see if you send in a patch to change it.
> But I won't be sending in that patch myself, that's all :)

OK, I'll queue it on my local patch queue. thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/