Re: [PATCH] w35und: fix usb_control_msg() error handling inwb35_probe()

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:10:42PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> If successful, the usb_control_msg() function returns the number of
> >>> bytes transferred. Fix up wb35_probe() to only bail out if the function
> >>> returns a negative number.
> >>>
> >>> Reported-by: Sandro Bonazzola <sandro.bonazzola@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> I'm confused, should I apply this patch or not?
> >
> > Yes, you should. What's confusing you here?
> 
> Oh, looking at the thread, I see how you got confused. The patch
> doesn't fix all of Sandro's problems but is an obvious improvement so
> it should be merged.

Hm, it doesn't apply to the latest -next tree, care to respin it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/