Re: if (unlikely(...)) == unnecessary?

[Chris Snook]

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Chris Snook wrote:
>
> > Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > I noticed that GCC >= 3.3 (not tried the ones before) automatically branches
> > > out the "if" code (and follow-through the "else" code, if there). Is that a
> > > coincidence or a rule we can rely on going forward?
> > That's the default behavior, but there are lots of things that can cause it to
> > behave differently.
>
> Please don't keep me hanging. What are they (just a few of the "lots" 
> that makes GCC follow-through "if" code)?
>
>
> - Davide

When you turn on optimizations, gcc will try to avoid branching just to execute 
a few instructions, since the cache miss and page fault penalties greatly exceed 
the cost of a branch mispredict.  The thresholds and heuristics vary, but in 
general, if you stick something like this:

if (condition) foo++;
else if (complex condition) {do lots of stuff}

In the middle of a long function body and compile with optimizations enabled, 
gcc will try to put the foo++ right after the evaluation.  Some ISAs support 
conditional instructions to let the compiler help fill pipeline bubbles, and 
some superscalar processors will speculatively execute it in parallel with their 
evaluation of the second condition, and proceed with whichever execution path is 
chosen when they retire the instruction evaluating the first conditional.

-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/