Re: [PATCH v4] softlockup: remove hung_task_check_count
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Jan 27 2009 - 08:26:52 EST
* Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The design was proposed by Frédéric Weisbecker. Peter Zijlstra suggested
> the use of RCU.
ok, this looks _much_ cleaner.
One question:
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> do_each_thread(g, t) {
> - if (!--max_count)
> + if (need_resched())
> goto unlock;
Isnt it dangerous to skip a check just because we got marked for
reschedule? Since it runs so rarely it could by accident be preempted and
we'd not get any checking done for a long time.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/