Re: [RFC,v2] x86_64: save_args out of line

From: Roland McGrath
Date: Tue Nov 18 2008 - 17:54:19 EST


> but that's the exception. Most of the annotations could be
> auto-generated.

Not really. An implicit .cfi_undefined can be auto-generated for an
unannotated instruction with an output register. An implicit .cfi_register
can be auto-generated for an unannotated register-to-register move. An
implicit .cfi_same_value can be auto-generated when you can tell a register
is being written with the register or stack slot tha the current CFI state
says holds the caller's value of that register. Beyond that, it gets into
either assumptions or hairy analysis of how stack slots are being used and
so forth.

I don't think auto-generation is very a useful angle to take for this any
time soon. Explicit (but simple) macros in the assembly is what I favor.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/