Re: data corruption: revalidating a (removable) hdd/flash on re-insert

From: Michael Tokarev
Date: Fri Oct 31 2008 - 12:10:39 EST


Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:38:01PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> To make a long story short: is there a way to force kernel
>> to re-validate a replaced usb-connected hard drive (or a
>> flash) *automatically*?
>>
>> Because right now, the kernel does not see that the drive
>> has been replaced, and uses *some* old cached values, which
>> results in random data corruption here and there, and other
>> similar odd things.
>>
>> For example, I've an USB flash reader (Carry Computer Eng.,
>> Co., Ltd 6-in-1 Card Reader, but that's not really relevant).
>> Among other things it has a compact flash slot. And I've
>> 2 differently-size CF cards.
[]
>> So at some point the kernel stopped noticing the drive
>> change in this configuration some time ago. I can't say
>> when exactly, since I didn't use the card reader for over
>> a year, and certainly didn't try it with more than one
>> card in a row for even longer time. It worked in the
>> past, that's for sure. And it definitely does not work
>> (resulting in the above mess) with 2.6.25, 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> I have had this happen with a few usb flash card readers. My solution
> was to unplug the usb cable then swap the card and connect the usb cable
> again. In the end I went and bought a different card reader, which does
> work correctly.

Well, this one is internal reader, which plugs into a 3" slot.
AND it also has the regular floppy drive in it, too. It's a combo,
a floppy drive AND a USB flash reader. As such, I can't easily
re-plug it (which definitely helps, too, but for that to work I
have to open the case), and I can't replace it either, because
this device is almost unique: I still need a floppy and there's
no other such combo drives, at least I wasn't able to find it.
It's a great device if you think of it: it connects two epochs
together...

> I highly suspect it is a mistake in the hardware causing the problem
> given the vast majority of readers do work correctly already.

So at least a) I'm not alone, and b) there's SOMETHING that works.
Excellent!

> So far I have had no problems with a silverstone, mitsumi, dell (in
> monitor), sandisk. I have had a problem with a no name cheap "15 in
> 1" reader which I stopped using because plugging and unplugging got
> annoying.
>
> So my recommendation is get a non broken device.

The thing is that with some older kernel(s) it defeinitely worked.
So I'd say it's the kernel which broke/regressed, not the hardware.
Suggesting to fix the hardware because new kernel does not work with
it anymore is.. strange at least.

And yes it was definitely a el cheapo no-name thing. But a..
great (epochs!) and hence unique thing, see above.. ;)

I'll try to find out when it broke. My first suspect was the patch
introduced not-so-recently (in 2.6.2x series) to support media
change notifications done by some hardware (wait for notify instead
of constantly polling).

Thanks!

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/