Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t withstruct cpumask
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 12:35:36 EST
* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
> >>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
> >> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
> >> arch changes for this reason.
> >>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
> >>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
> >> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
> >> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
> > guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
> > and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
> > pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
> > the rest of the changes.
> > Ingo
> Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so
> they would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of
> "replacement" patches if you prefer.
how big are the deltas? You might send a single interdiff - it's
supposed to be all small, right?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/