Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with structcpumask
From: Mike Travis
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 12:17:25 EST
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
>>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
>> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
>> arch changes for this reason.
>>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
>>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
>> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
>> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
> guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
> and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
> pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
> the rest of the changes.
Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so they
would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of "replacement"
patches if you prefer.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/