Re: [PATCH 27/35] cpumask: accessors to manipulate possible/present/online/activemaps From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

[Mike Travis]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> +void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
>> +{
>> +	if (possible)
>> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_possible_map);
>> +	else
>> +		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_possible_map);
>> +}
>> +void set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present)
>> +{
> 
> i added the missing newlines between all the new function definitions.
> 
> 	Ingo

Thanks!  I normally do this when spotting them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/