Re: [PATCH 27/35] cpumask: accessors to manipulatepossible/present/online/active maps From: Rusty Russell<rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> +void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
> +{
> +	if (possible)
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_possible_map);
> +	else
> +		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_possible_map);
> +}
> +void set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present)
> +{

i added the missing newlines between all the new function definitions.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/