[PATCH] ACPI suspend: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependence and some compilation warnings (was: Re: [announce] new tree: "fix all build warnings, on all configs")

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, 22 of October 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> 
> > >   drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c:67: warning: âacpi_pm_disable_gpesâ defined but not used
> 
> > > 
> > > Shows that this code has an identity crisis due to a maze of #ifdefs, in
> > > the PM_SLEEP && !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATION case for example.
> > 
> > This case is invalid, because PM_SLEEP == SUSPEND || HIBERNATION !
> 
> I though so too, but 2.6.27 appears to have added XEN to the mix:
> 
> config PM_SLEEP
>         bool
>         depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION || XEN_SAVE_RESTORE

Yeah, which breaks things. :-(

The patch below should fix it and BTW I think ACPI_SLEEP should not depend
on XEN_SAVE_RESTORE anyway, so this is a bug fix really (please consider as
.28 material, probably -stable too).

Thanks,
Rafael

---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>

ACPI suspend: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependence and some compilation warnings

Initially CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined as
CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION and some ACPI code, most
importantly the code in drivers/acpi/main.c, was written with this
assumption.  Currently, however, CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is also set when
CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE is set.

This causes some compilation warnings to appear in
drivers/acpi/main.c if both CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION
are unset and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set (this was impossible before).
To fix this problem, redefine CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP do depend directly
on CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION, as originally intended, and
use it instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP in drivers/acpi/main.c, wherever
appropriate.

Additionally, move the acpi_target_sleep_state definition from under
the #ifdef to prevent compilation from failing in some cases. 

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/Kconfig      |    2 +-
 drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c |    7 +++----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ if ACPI
 
 config ACPI_SLEEP
 	bool
-	depends on PM_SLEEP
+	depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION
 	default y
 
 config ACPI_PROCFS
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include "sleep.h"
 
 u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
+static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
 
 static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_state)
 {
@@ -45,9 +46,7 @@ static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_s
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
 /*
  * ACPI 1.0 wants us to execute _PTS before suspending devices, so we allow the
  * user to request that behavior by using the 'acpi_old_suspend_ordering'
@@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ static void acpi_pm_end(void)
 	 */
 	acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
 }
-#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
 extern void do_suspend_lowlevel(void);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/