Re: [PATCH] Export tiny shmem_file_setup for DRM-GEM
From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Mon Oct 20 2008 - 14:48:02 EST
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 12:52 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > We're trying to keep the !CONFIG_SHMEM tiny-shmem.c (using ramfs without
> > swap) in synch with CONFIG_SHMEM shmem.c (and mpm is preparing patches
> > to combine them). I was glad to see EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shmem_file_setup)
> > go into shmem.c, but why not support DRM-GEM when !CONFIG_SHMEM too?
> > But caution says still depend on MMU, since !CONFIG_MMU is.. different.
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hugh, what path do you usually take for upstreaming shmem bits and what
> path should I take with my unify patch?
I send them to Andrew (Cc linux-kernel and/or linux-mm, erratic which,
at best depending on what the area of interest is - there's not much
of interest to linux-mm in the case of this unification) to get their
airing in -mm until the next merge window.
You could do that, or were you expecting me to pick up what you had?
We can do it that way too if you prefer: as things stood, I think
you were intending to add a patch to remove that redundant function,
and another to remove CONFIG_TMPFS - but I can do them if you prefer.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/