Re: [PATCH 0/3] ftrace: separate ftrace from ftrace

[Ingo Molnar]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There has been a lot of confusion between ftrace the infrastructure 
> and ftrace the function tracer within ftrace.  Developers have added 
> dependencies on HAVE_FTRACE when they did not need to. The HAVE_FTRACE 
> was the architecture supported the function tracer.
> 
> This patch series renames the ftrace function tracer to just that, 
> FUNCTION_TRACER.  And even renames the tracer shown to users from 
> 'ftrace' to 'function'.
> 
> Now, when referring to ftrace, it means the ftrace infrastructure, and 
> when referring to the function trace, it is now called the function 
> tracer.
> 
> The second patch cause a lot of files to be touched. Mostly Makefiles 
> and Kconfig files. As well as default configs.

applied the following bits to tip/tracing/ftrace:

 3ce83ae: ftrace: rename the ftrace tracer to function
 606576c: ftrace: rename FTRACE to FUNCTION_TRACER
 c2db805: ftrace: fix depends
 bd95b88: ftrace: release functions from hash
 c513867: ftrace: do not enclose logic in WARN_ON

thanks Steve! I left out the defconfig bits - out of sync symbol names 
there do not hurt, and those files are high-flux anyway and generally 
updated by the arch maintainers regularly.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/