Re: [PATCH] Use PC-BIOS NUMLOCK flag

From: Samuel Thibault
Date: Thu Oct 16 2008 - 15:11:26 EST


Bodo Eggert, le Thu 16 Oct 2008 20:00:31 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Bodo Eggert, le Thu 16 Oct 2008 13:59:49 +0200, a écrit :
>
> > > + If you have an alternative firmware like OpenFirmware or LinuxBios,
> > > + this flag might not be set correctly, which results in a random state
> > > + of the Numlock key.
> >
> > That's an issue. That means that distributions will just not enable,
> > and thus the flag is not really useful, since people who would
> > compile their own kernel would very likely have already setup their
> > initialization scripts into calling setleds +num (or just set LEDS=+num
> > in /etc/console-tools/config on a debian machine).
>
> I hope somebody will pop up and say "Hey, those will create an IBM PC data
> area, because they run DOS" ...

Mmm, or rather "hey, here are the patches to fix those BIOSes" :)

Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/