Re: [PATCH] SiS55x, another x86 CPU

[Hans Schou]

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> > I think time is up for getting rid of Pine and there stupid license. I'll
> > check if "nail" can handle attachment correctly.
>
> alpine?

Well, Gentoo didn't have it and it is probably a "wrong" license.

> But, why do you send patches as attachments in the first place?

Ingo said I could do so when it was something to do with x86 patches.
Anyway, it looks like ^R in Pine did work correctly.

> It's recommended to _not_ do that, for easier review.

OK.

> Pine can handle that fine since ages (I switched from elm to pine 13 or
> so years ago).

Yes, my so called friends have been bullying me for that long with the Pine 
license. Mutt is not an option either.

/hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/