Re: [PATCH 0/2] SIGWINCH problem with terminal apps still alive

[Alan Cox]

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:59:52 +0200 (CEST)
Bodo Eggert <7eggert@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > > That is why I propose usage of real_tty in ioctl() handling:
> > > 
> > > case TIOCGWINSZ:
> > >                 return tiocgwinsz(real_tty, p);
> > 
> > Congratulations we've finally got there - and that is exactly the code in
> > the current tty tree.
> 
> These patches are missing from 2.6.27. There you have:
> 
>     case TIOCGWINSZ:
>         return tiocgwinsz(tty, p);

Yes I know. The rules for the stable tree are that it has to go upstream
first. It has not gone upstream so it cannot go into the stable tree yet.
As and when Linus takes the relevant changes I will send a set to the
stable tree.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/