Re: Endless ACPI errors on Linus tree (5b664cb235)

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Jul 21 2008 - 04:44:15 EST

> That would basically mean there's no way to use the v2 fields here - all
> the code could do is report the inconsitency, but it would have to use
> the v1 field in any case. That's really a shame, and as before I'm
> somewhat hesitant to do so. The only way I could easily find myself
> doing this would be to introduce a command line option controlling the
> behavior here, but that would need to be done outside of the ACPICA
> code I'd assume.
> Andi, Bob, Len?

I think we should only use v1 FADT fields for now and ignore v2.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at