Re: dma_alloc_coherent() on PPC32: physical addresses above 2Gpossible?

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Sun Jul 20 2008 - 15:49:18 EST


On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:25:51 +0200
Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:36:23 +0200
> > Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> PS: I don't want to set the DMA mask of this device to
> >> DMA_31BIT_MASK because that would be detrimental to other functions
> >> of the device. It's a TI TSB43AB22A FireWire controller.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > just want to mention that you can set the coherent mask separately
> > from the generic mask... is that sufficient for your load?
> > (you can even set it just for this allocation..)
>
> Hmm. Would that be done this way?
> During probe:
>
> if (chip_is_tsb43ab22a) {
> if (dma_supported(dev, DMA_31BIT_MASK))
> chip->needs_dma_mask_workaround = 1;
> else
> chip->needs_some_other_workaround = 1;
> }

btw it might be nicer to make this

chip->something_special_mask = DMA_31BIT_MASK;

then you can just use the mask from this struct rather than another
check


--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/