Re: [PATCH] x86: traps and do_traps under one hood

From: Alexander van Heukelum
Date: Tue Jul 15 2008 - 10:11:15 EST


On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:22:38 +0530, "Jaswinder Singh"
<jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> Declaring x86 traps under one hood.
> Declaring x86 do_traps before defining them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c | 20 ---------
> arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c | 21 ----------
> include/asm-x86/mach-default/mach_traps.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

Hi Jaswinder,

I think moving the declarations to a header file is a good thing,
but I don't think mach_traps.h is a suitable place. The definitions
of the functions are in entry_32.S and entry_64.S, so I would suggest
making a new header include/asm-x86/entry.h. Some other ENTRY's
(like system_call and some xen-specific ones) would then also fit
in this header.

What do you think?

Greetings,
Alexander

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
> index 8a76897..9107ef7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
> @@ -77,26 +77,6 @@ char ignore_fpu_irq;
> gate_desc idt_table[256]
> __attribute__((__section__(".data.idt"))) = { { { { 0, 0 } } }, };
>
> -asmlinkage void divide_error(void);
> -asmlinkage void debug(void);
> -asmlinkage void nmi(void);
> -asmlinkage void int3(void);
> -asmlinkage void overflow(void);
> -asmlinkage void bounds(void);
> -asmlinkage void invalid_op(void);
> -asmlinkage void device_not_available(void);
> -asmlinkage void coprocessor_segment_overrun(void);
> -asmlinkage void invalid_TSS(void);
> -asmlinkage void segment_not_present(void);
> -asmlinkage void stack_segment(void);
> -asmlinkage void general_protection(void);
> -asmlinkage void page_fault(void);
> -asmlinkage void coprocessor_error(void);
> -asmlinkage void simd_coprocessor_error(void);
> -asmlinkage void alignment_check(void);
> -asmlinkage void spurious_interrupt_bug(void);
> -asmlinkage void machine_check(void);
> -
> int panic_on_unrecovered_nmi;
> int kstack_depth_to_print = 24;
> static unsigned int code_bytes = 64;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
> index 2696a68..56c413c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
> @@ -54,27 +54,6 @@
>
> #include <mach_traps.h>
>
> -asmlinkage void divide_error(void);
> -asmlinkage void debug(void);
> -asmlinkage void nmi(void);
> -asmlinkage void int3(void);
> -asmlinkage void overflow(void);
> -asmlinkage void bounds(void);
> -asmlinkage void invalid_op(void);
> -asmlinkage void device_not_available(void);
> -asmlinkage void double_fault(void);
> -asmlinkage void coprocessor_segment_overrun(void);
> -asmlinkage void invalid_TSS(void);
> -asmlinkage void segment_not_present(void);
> -asmlinkage void stack_segment(void);
> -asmlinkage void general_protection(void);
> -asmlinkage void page_fault(void);
> -asmlinkage void coprocessor_error(void);
> -asmlinkage void simd_coprocessor_error(void);
> -asmlinkage void alignment_check(void);
> -asmlinkage void spurious_interrupt_bug(void);
> -asmlinkage void machine_check(void);
> -
> int panic_on_unrecovered_nmi;
> int kstack_depth_to_print = 12;
> static unsigned int code_bytes = 64;
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/mach-default/mach_traps.h
> b/include/asm-x86/mach-default/mach_traps.h
> index 2fe7705..e803b1d 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/mach-default/mach_traps.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/mach-default/mach_traps.h
> @@ -36,4 +36,66 @@ static inline void reassert_nmi(void)
> unlock_cmos();
> }
>
> +/* traps */
> +
> +/* Common in X86_32 and X86_64 */
> +asmlinkage void divide_error(void);
> +asmlinkage void debug(void);
> +asmlinkage void nmi(void);
> +asmlinkage void int3(void);
> +asmlinkage void overflow(void);
> +asmlinkage void bounds(void);
> +asmlinkage void invalid_op(void);
> +asmlinkage void device_not_available(void);
> +asmlinkage void coprocessor_segment_overrun(void);
> +asmlinkage void invalid_TSS(void);
> +asmlinkage void segment_not_present(void);
> +asmlinkage void stack_segment(void);
> +asmlinkage void general_protection(void);
> +asmlinkage void page_fault(void);
> +asmlinkage void coprocessor_error(void);
> +asmlinkage void simd_coprocessor_error(void);
> +asmlinkage void alignment_check(void);
> +asmlinkage void spurious_interrupt_bug(void);
> +asmlinkage void machine_check(void);
> +
> +void do_divide_error(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_overflow(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_bounds(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_coprocessor_segment_overrun(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_invalid_TSS(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_segment_not_present(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_stack_segment(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_alignment_check(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_nmi(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +
> +extern int panic_on_unrecovered_nmi;
> +extern int kstack_depth_to_print;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +
> +void do_iret_error(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_int3(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_debug(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void math_error(void __user *);
> +void do_coprocessor_error(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_simd_coprocessor_error(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +void do_spurious_interrupt_bug(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +unsigned long patch_espfix_desc(unsigned long, unsigned long);
> +asmlinkage void math_emulate(long);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
> +
> +asmlinkage void double_fault(void);
> +
> +asmlinkage void do_int3(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +asmlinkage void do_stack_segment(struct pt_regs *, long);
> +asmlinkage void do_debug(struct pt_regs *, unsigned long);
> +asmlinkage void do_coprocessor_error(struct pt_regs *);
> +asmlinkage void do_simd_coprocessor_error(struct pt_regs *);
> +asmlinkage void do_spurious_interrupt_bug(struct pt_regs *);
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
> #endif /* !_MACH_TRAPS_H */
> --
> 1.5.5.1
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
Alexander van Heukelum
heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different…

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/