Re: [PATCH 15/39] don't save ebx in putuser_32.S

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Sat Jun 28 2008 - 08:23:51 EST

Next message: Matthew Garrett: "Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n"
Previous message: Haavard Skinnemoen: "[PATCH RESEND 1/3] atmel_nand speedup via {read,write}s{b,w}()"
In reply to: Glauber Costa: "Re: [PATCH 17/39] clobber rbx in putuser_64.S"
Next in thread: Glauber Costa: "Re: [PATCH 15/39] don't save ebx in putuser_32.S"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> clobber it in the inline asm macros, and let the compiler do this for us.

I would expect that definitely will cause code size regressions ...

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew Garrett: "Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n"
Previous message: Haavard Skinnemoen: "[PATCH RESEND 1/3] atmel_nand speedup via {read,write}s{b,w}()"
In reply to: Glauber Costa: "Re: [PATCH 17/39] clobber rbx in putuser_64.S"
Next in thread: Glauber Costa: "Re: [PATCH 15/39] don't save ebx in putuser_32.S"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]