Re: Recoverable MCA interrupts from NMI handlers? IPMI and RCU?

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 05:03:37PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Corey Minyard wrote:
> >If you mean the IPMI driver, it does not tie into any SMI.  It 
> >theoretically could since there's a bit for that in the watchdog timer, 
> >but there's been no demand and I haven't looked at it.  I guess it would 
> >be better than an NMI.
> >
> >If it did tie in, it would most likely just panic to get useful 
> >information out before the watchdog reset the system.
> 
> The main reason I could see wanting to use SMI would be as a debugging 
> tool, since SMI makes the entire state of the system available at a low 
> level; however, trying to interact with the state of the kernel at this 
> priority level seems beyond the pale in terms of complexity.

Works for me!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/