Re: [patch 0/4 v2] vfs: fix utimensat() non-conformances to spec

[Michael Kerrisk]

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This patch series is a revised version of the patch series
>> that I sent yesterday to fix various utimensat()
>> non-conformances.  Patches 1 and 2 are unchanged (and were
>> Acked by Miklos); patches 3 and 4 are revised following
>> comments by Miklos.
>>
>> As requested I've split the original patch
>> ("utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch)";
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/24325 )
>> into four parts.  Ideally, these should be applied for
>> 2.6.26-rc, for the reasons outlined in my earlier mail
>> "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (test results)",
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/689411/ .
>>
>> The four patches can be applied independently, except that
>> patch 3 needs patch 2 to be applied first.
>
> ACK for all four patches.
>
> In patch 3/4 the indentation of that big "if" looks really horribly
> broken, but it will be cleaned out completely, so I won't complain...

Aargh -- true, I messed up the indentation!

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/