Re: [patch 0/4 v2] vfs: fix utimensat() non-conformances to spec

[Miklos Szeredi]

> This patch series is a revised version of the patch series
> that I sent yesterday to fix various utimensat()
> non-conformances.  Patches 1 and 2 are unchanged (and were
> Acked by Miklos); patches 3 and 4 are revised following
> comments by Miklos.
> 
> As requested I've split the original patch
> ("utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch)";
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/24325 )
> into four parts.  Ideally, these should be applied for
> 2.6.26-rc, for the reasons outlined in my earlier mail
> "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (test results)",
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/689411/ .
> 
> The four patches can be applied independently, except that
> patch 3 needs patch 2 to be applied first.

ACK for all four patches.

In patch 3/4 the indentation of that big "if" looks really horribly
broken, but it will be cleaned out completely, so I won't complain...

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/