Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: Add CONFIG_BUILTIN_FIRMWARE option

From: Michael Buesch
Date: Mon May 26 2008 - 13:12:54 EST


On Monday 26 May 2008 19:09:12 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 26, 2008, Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 26 May 2008 05:13:18 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> On May 25, 2008, Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > One additional thing is to make sure the usability of the whole stuff
> >> > is not reduded.
> >>
> >> Removing support for slashes wouldn't reduce usability. It would be
> >> no more than silly policy (and ego?) enforcement.
>
> > I the other mail you say that the string is _not_ a filename.
>
> I do, and I stand by that claim, that is not backed by documentation,
> but rather by peeking at the implementation.

Right.

> > So why do we want to remove the slash from the allowed charset, if
> > the string is not a filename?
>
> Exactly my point. I don't know any reason to do that. It appears to
> be just silly policy (and ego) enforcement.

Ok I see. It seems I misunderstood your mail. Sorry for that.

--
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/