Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: Add CONFIG_BUILTIN_FIRMWARE option

[Alexandre Oliva]

On May 26, 2008, Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Monday 26 May 2008 05:13:18 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On May 25, 2008, Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > One additional thing is to make sure the usability of the whole stuff
>> > is not reduded.
>> 
>> Removing support for slashes wouldn't reduce usability.  It would be
>> no more than silly policy (and ego?) enforcement.

> I the other mail you say that the string is _not_ a filename.

I do, and I stand by that claim, that is not backed by documentation,
but rather by peeking at the implementation.

> So why do we want to remove the slash from the allowed charset, if
> the string is not a filename?

Exactly my point.  I don't know any reason to do that.  It appears to
be just silly policy (and ego) enforcement.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ÂSÃ Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/