Re: [PATCH 001/001] mmu-notifier-core v17
From: Jack Steiner
Date: Mon May 12 2008 - 16:01:41 EST
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 09:32:30PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> With KVM/GFP/XPMEM there isn't just the primary CPU MMU pointing to
> pages. There are secondary MMUs (with secondary sptes and secondary
> tlbs) too. sptes in the kvm case are shadow pagetables, but when I say
> spte in mmu-notifier context, I mean "secondary pte". In GRU case
> there's no actual secondary pte and there's only a secondary tlb
> because the GRU secondary MMU has no knowledge about sptes and every
> secondary tlb miss event in the MMU always generates a page fault that
> has to be resolved by the CPU (this is not the case of KVM where the a
> secondary tlb miss will walk sptes in hardware and it will refill the
>...
FYI, I applied to patch to a tree that has the GRU driver. All regression
tests passed.
--- jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/