Re: [ANNOUNCE] kmemcheck v7

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Yeah, as soon as the stack pointer changes, everything below it is 
> > invalidated (except if the stack-pointer change was actually determined 
> > to be a stack switch).
> >     
>
> It might in theory, but at least it doesn't for my test program.
>   

If you'd read a tiny bit further down my mail, you'd have seen my 
explanation of why your test program isn't testing what you think it is, 
and a variant which does.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/