Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies

[Michael Opdenacker]

On 04/29/2008 09:56 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Reading the thread, it actually seems
> like Michael wanted to submit the patch
> much like the aforementioned one of
> mine:
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/1/18/580583
> but haven't done so in time, and as the
> result, the wrong one stuck in.
> But this is never too late to correct, I
> hope.
>
> So I see 2 options: either revert the
> patch completely, or revert the dependancies
> like Michael suggested initially (if I
> understand his suggestion right).
> Both patches are here, in this thread.
> Thoughts?
>
>   
Stas, Dmitry,

I agree with you... on a regular system, all the platform devices should
be enumerated, even if we don't use their drivers. It's only for use in
embedded devices (CONFIG_EMBEDDED) that we could omit this enumeration
to reduce kernel size.

Would you post a patch doing this?

Thank you,

:-)

Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/