Re: Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sun Apr 27 2008 - 19:21:22 EST


James Bottomley wrote:
My major complaint is the lack of review and notice, not the actual
patch.

[...]

I wouldn't have picked ... I'd have asked for input.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I definitely have discussed this issue with a large number of people. I can't tell you in which specific fora, because it usually became a very brief conversation since there really is only one plausible answer (*especially* in the light of the precedents set by other architectures.)

Ingo's mention of it on LKML in this email:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/25/287

... is pretty typical of how the conversation usually went.

-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/