Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() during suspend with 2.6.25-rc8

[Jiri Kosina]

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > I know. However preempt_count is a little bit inconsistent in such cases 
> > though.
> And? interrupts off beats preempt count anyways. Why did you write the 
> patch? Was there a (incorrect) warning triggered?

Reported at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/130

BTW is also mce_init() (called from mce_resume()) guaranteed to run with 
IRQs off?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/