Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() during suspend with 2.6.25-rc8

[Andi Kleen]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:04:39AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > > It is not safe to call smp_processor_id() in cases we are not sure 
> > > someone will not reschedule us.
> > We are sure. Machine checks always run with interrupts off.
> 
> I know. However preempt_count is a little bit inconsistent in such cases 
> though.

And? interrupts off beats preempt count anyways.

Why did you write the patch? Was there a (incorrect) warning triggered?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/