Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] send_sigqueue: don't forget about handle_stop_signal()

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 03/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> (on top of Pavel's signals-consolidate-send_sigqueue-and-send_group_sigqueue.patch)
> 
> send_group_sigqueue() calls handle_stop_signal(), send_sigqueue() doesn't.
> This is not consistent and in fact I'd say this is (minor) bug.
> 
> Move handle_stop_signal() from send_group_sigqueue() to do_send_sigqueue(),
> the latter is called by send_sigqueue() too.

Sorry for the noise, but I forgot to mention that this patch of course depends
on signals-re-assign-cld_continued-notification-from-the-sender-to-reciever.patch

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/