Re: [Suspend-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off aftersuspend-to-disk. Screen becomes green.

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:28 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > So the advantage of the kernel suspend/resume hooks for the DRM layer is
> > that the kernel video drivers can do full state save/restore (which X
> > usually doesn't do, and isn't really designed to do), so that if your
> > platform *doesn't* do it all, you'll still end up with a usable machine
> > in the end.
>
> Well, I'm also hoping that eventually we could even just not do the VT
> switch at all, and the kernel can treat X as "just another user process"
> that it freezes.

Hell yes.

> At least from a mode setting standpoint.
>
> We'd still want to make sure that X repaints the screen if the contents
> were lost, of course. And this is going to depend very intimately on the
> type of graphics card and whether the video RAM is saved by STR or not -
> for the Intel integrated graphics kind of situation, the video RAM will be
> refreshed along with all the other memory, but for other cards we may end
> up having to do the VT switch not so much for modesetting reasons as just
> a way to get X to save and restore all the *other* state.

Drivers supporting kernel modesetting will have to stuff their VRAM somewhere, 
yeah.  Hopefully X won't have much to do with it though...

> How close is the i915 driver from not having to even signal X? Or is that
> just a pipedream of mine?

It's there in the modesetting tree (though the requisite changes to avoid VT 
notification aren't done, it should all work fine).

Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/