Re: [PATCH v2] Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (wakeup)

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:31:37PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> >But I assume in less obvious way.
> >It is a bit more intuitive to error out on missing
> >-m32 support than gcc failing to support .code16
> >or some other inline assembler magic.
> >
> 
> No, you will get the message "the selected CPU doesn't support the 
> x86-64 architecture".
A bit confusing but acceptable.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/