Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 3/4] IPMI: convert locked counters to atomics

From: Matt Domsch
Date: Sat Feb 16 2008 - 11:44:59 EST


On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:30:51PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> From: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Atomics are a lot more efficient and neat than using a lock.

per_cpu variables are a lot more efficient and neat than using locks
for simple statistics. no cache line bouncing to increment the
counter. Are these read so often that atomics are really better?

Thanks,
Matt

--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/