Re: LFENCE instruction (was: [rfc][patch 3/3] x86: optimisebarriers)

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:47:42 +0200 (CEST)
Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > According to latest memory ordering specification documents from
> > Intel and AMD, both manufacturers are committed to in-order loads
> > from cacheable memory for the x86 architecture. Hence, smp_rmb()
> > may be a simple barrier.
> >
> > http://developer.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/318147.pdf 
> > http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/24593.pdf
> 
> Hi
> 
> I'm just wondering about one thing --- what is LFENCE instruction
> good for?
> 
> SFENCE is for enforcing ordering in write-combining buffers (it
> doesn't have sense in write-back cache mode).
> MFENCE is for preventing of moving stores past loads.
> 
> But what is LFENCE for? I read the above documents and they already
> say that CPUs have ordered loads.
> 

The cpus also have an explicit set of instructions that deliberately do
unordered stores/loads, and s/lfence etc are mostly designed for those.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/