Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in 2.6.22.6/7 {maybe more}ARM/StrongARM

[Dave Jones]

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:31:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:22:55 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > 
 > >  > 
 > >  > OK, here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm3/broken-out/fix-x86_64-mm-sched-clock-share.patch
 > >  > 
 > >  > So I guess what we want to do here is to revert that patch, test i386
 > >  > allnoconfig and then fix up anything which breaks.
 > > 
 > > Nothing breaks for me with make ARCH=i386 bzImage on my x86-64 box
 > > (which should be the same as a native build).
 > 
 > Was that with allnoconfig?

yeah.

 > > The functions that complain in that patch header don't seem to actually
 > > exist in mainline at all. (`init_sched_clock' and `call_r_s_f')
 > > Did this patch perhaps jump the gun, and these are -mm only ?
 > 
 > Could be that this patch fixed version 17 of sched-clock-share and we ended
 > up merging verion 56.  It was awful.

heh.

I think just reverting that change for .23 makes sense. It doesn't
seem that anything breaks by not having it there, and we know it
definitly breaks arm at least.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/