Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in {maybe more}ARM/StrongARM

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Sep 25 2007 - 13:32:23 EST

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:22:55 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >
> > OK, here:
> >
> > So I guess what we want to do here is to revert that patch, test i386
> > allnoconfig and then fix up anything which breaks.
> Nothing breaks for me with make ARCH=i386 bzImage on my x86-64 box
> (which should be the same as a native build).

Was that with allnoconfig?

> The functions that complain in that patch header don't seem to actually
> exist in mainline at all. (`init_sched_clock' and `call_r_s_f')
> Did this patch perhaps jump the gun, and these are -mm only ?

Could be that this patch fixed version 17 of sched-clock-share and we ended
up merging verion 56. It was awful.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at