Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs

[Eric W. Biederman]

Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> For the K7 and K8 cores AMD systems are exactly like Intel systems
>> with respect to MTRRs (although AMD systems also have additional registers)
>> For the K9 core (i.e. AMD socket F or the K8 with DDR2 support) there
>
> It's called K8RevE, not K9

revF not revE.  I think AMD was code-naming that K9 before the socket F
part was released.

revE was the last DDR rev of the K8 core.

>> is an additional mechanism that makes everything above 4G write-back
>> cacheable without using any MTRRs.
>
> ... but not BIOS use this mechanism (often there are BIOS switches
> for several MTRR models or it is just the wrong one hardcoded), so Linux 
> should detect the broken cases.

Yes. They are and I have seen at least two motherboards that fit this
description.  I almost freaked out looking at a system with 16G and
only 4G setup to be cached.

The painful bit is I have also seen such a system with not all of the
lower 4G cached.  Which caused some interesting booting issues.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/