Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

On Tue, 2007-06-26 12:16:39 +0200, DervishD <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  * Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx> dixit:
> > On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:43:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > > OTOH, you also didn't supply a patch.  If you do this, I'll be glad to
> > > consider it.  If I can read it, that is.
> > 
> > "s|/bin/sh|/bin/bash" is so hard to do ?
> 
>     Given that it happens too with "ldd", it really *is* that hard. I
> don't know why still people think that /bin/sh is always /bin/bash. If
> they want/need bash, that's ok to me, I will have it installed for such
> tasks, but they should call it "#!/bin/bash".

...or "#!/usr/bin/env bash" for what it's worth...  The same for plain
`sh'.

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx              +49-172-7608481
 Signature of:                      http://perl.plover.com/Questions.html
 the second  :

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature