Re: [34/37] Large blocksize support in ramfs

[Andreas Dilger]

On Jun 20, 2007  11:29 -0700, clameter@xxxxxxx wrote:
> If you apply this patch and then you can f.e. try this:
> 
> 	mount -tramfs -o10 none /media

> @@ -164,10 +165,15 @@ static int ramfs_fill_super(struct super
> +	if (options && *options)
> +		order = simple_strtoul(options, NULL, 10);

This is probably a bad name for a mount option.  What about "order=10"?
Otherwise you prevent any other option from being used in the future.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/