Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 15, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> You have repeatedly stated that if a system runs a GPL'd system then
> all rights to the system that the manufacturer has *must* be passed
> on to the end-user.

Not really, not to the entire system.  The spirit is not clear in this
regard, when it talks about "all rights", but I understand it means
"all rights related with the program", i.e., "you must let others do
with the program everything that you can".

> Before you answer - this question is *NOT* based on any interpretation or 
> reading of the GPLv3. What it is based on is statements you have repeatedly 
> made. So no claims this being already covered, and no claims that this isn't 
> a situation covered by the GPLv3.

Sorry that I have been unclear.  This just goes to show that what we
write isn't always the whole story, and quite often intent doesn't
shine through the words.  While legal terms have a stronger demand for
clarity and non-ambiguity, intent and other less-formal forms of
communication often depend on a lot of context for correct
interpretation.  And then, if multiple interpretations are possible,
the only resort is to ask the author and hope s/he still remembers
what s/he meant.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/