Re: Instead of GPL License - Why not LKL? (Linux Kernel License)

From: Jarek Poplawski
Date: Fri Jun 15 2007 - 04:59:15 EST

On 15-06-2007 08:52, debian developer wrote:
> Even if it's just a name change, it will be a different license and
> requires the
> agreement of all authors. It's much easier( not that we want to) to go
> to GPLv3 than
> go to LKL.

Doing bad things is usually much easier than good things.
After doing something much easier redoing it may be much
harder or even impossible. And this need of agreement of
all authors looks like a really promising principle of
large project management...

Jarek P.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at