Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> 
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
> possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
> 
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
> 
> 
> Subject    : system doesn't come out of suspend  (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391
> Submitter  : Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>              Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@xxxxxx>
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>              Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
>              Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
>              Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Status     : problem is being debugged
> 
> 
> Subject    : first disk access after resume takes several minutes
>              ('date' does not advance after resume from RAM, CONFIG_NO_HZ=n)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/117
> Submitter  : Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>              Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> Status     : problem is being debugged

I lost track of Michaels various nested problems.

Michael can you please give a summary on _all_ entries in the
regressions list against Linus latest ?

Thanks,

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/