Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31

[jos poortvliet]

Op Tuesday 20 March 2007, schreef Bill Davidsen:
> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:38 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:22 +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
> >>> I'd recon KDE regresses because of kioslaves waiting on a pipe
> >>> (communication with the app they're doing IO for) and then expiring.
> >>> That's why splitting IO from an app isn't exactly smart. It should at
> >>> least be ran in an another thread.
> >>
> >> Hm.  Sounds rather a lot like the...
> >> X sucks, fix X and RSDL will rock your world.  RSDL is perfect.
> >> ...that I've been getting.
> >
> > not really, only X sucks. KDE works atleast as good with rsdl as
> > vanilla. i dont know how originally said kde works worse, wasnt it just
> > someone that thought?
>
> It was probably me, and I had the opinion that KDE is not as smooth as
> GNOME with RSDL. I haven't had time to measure, but using for daily
> stuff for about an hour each way hasn't changed my opinion. Every once
> in a while KDE will KLUNK to a halt for 200-300ms doing mundane stuff
> like redrawing a page, scrolling, etc. I don't see it with GNOME.

yeah, here too... sometimes even longer (and I have a dualcore, 3gb ram, 
damnit!)

-- 
Disclaimer:

Alles wat ik doe denk en zeg is gebaseerd op het wereldbeeld wat ik nu heb. 
Ik ben niet verantwoordelijk voor wijzigingen van de wereld, of het beeld wat 
ik daarvan heb, noch voor de daaruit voortvloeiende gedragingen van mezelf. 
Alles wat ik zeg is aardig bedoeld, tenzij expliciet vermeld.

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature