[patch 18/31] Fix extraneous IPSEC larval SA creation

[Greg KH]

-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Joy Latten <latten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[XFRM]: Fix missing protocol comparison of larval SAs.

I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
places without checking for protocol match. So when using both
AH and ESP, whichever one gets added first, deletes the larval SA.
It seems AH always gets added first and ESP is always the larval
SA's protocol since the xfrm->tmpl has it first. Thus causing the
additional km_query()

Adding the check eliminates accidental double SA creation.

Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <latten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -707,7 +707,8 @@ static struct xfrm_state *__find_acq_cor
 		    x->props.mode   != mode ||
 		    x->props.family != family ||
 		    x->km.state     != XFRM_STATE_ACQ ||
-		    x->id.spi       != 0)
+		    x->id.spi       != 0 ||
+		    x->id.proto	    != proto)
 			continue;
 
 		switch (family) {
@@ -804,7 +805,8 @@ int xfrm_state_add(struct xfrm_state *x)
 
 	if (use_spi && x->km.seq) {
 		x1 = __xfrm_find_acq_byseq(x->km.seq);
-		if (x1 && xfrm_addr_cmp(&x1->id.daddr, &x->id.daddr, family)) {
+		if (x1 && ((x1->id.proto != x->id.proto) ||
+		    xfrm_addr_cmp(&x1->id.daddr, &x->id.daddr, family))) {
 			xfrm_state_put(x1);
 			x1 = NULL;
 		}

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/