Re: RSDL v0.31

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Sat Mar 17 2007 - 01:16:48 EST


Greetings Con & company;

I built and rebooted to 2.6.20.3-rdsl-0.31 earlier this evening, but
purposely waited till amanda was well underway to make a report.

The report is that I really really have to work hard to tell that amanda
is running even though the cpu according to gkrellm is running between 97
and 99%.

For my loading then, this is as much an improvement over the -ck1 patch as
it was over the un-patched but same version of the kernel. FWIW, I'd
also built a 2.6.20.3-rdsl-0.30 and ran it for a day but it was nearly as
spastic as no patch.

Did I say I like this yet? :)

Now I'm waiting for 2.6.21-rc4 to make the mirrors & see if tar is still
broken. Based on the clues I've been able to find, I bz'd the tar since
that's a fedora supplied rpm install. Humm, I just now recalled that I
have a tarball built tar-1.15.1 on another drive, I was using it when I
was running FC2, so that might be something else to bisect against, and I
will, bet on it.

Many thanks Con, this is very nice. I've only seen one split second when
the screen was about 2 chars behind my typing. This is great. :-)

--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
When a cow laughs, does milk come out of its nose?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/