Re: [PATCH] Minor coding style fix

[Jesper Juhl]

On 08/10/06, Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kernel generally follow the style
>
> if (func()) {
> /* failed case */
> } else {
> /* success */
> }

Please submit patches inline, having to copy them from attachments to
be able to reply is a pain.

> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 98489d8..55cb77c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_notifier_call_cha
>  void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh)
>  {
>  	mutex_init(&nh->mutex);
> -	if (init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu) < 0)
> +	if (init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu))
>  		BUG();
>  	nh->head = NULL;
>  }

I really liked the old code better. If in the future
init_srcu_struct() is changed to also return >0 for some conditions,
then that would not previously have triggered BUG(), but after your
changes it will. The code, as it were, perfectly expressed what it
wanted to happen - if it returns less than zero it's a BUG().
I say leave it alone.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/